AL NAKBA: The Palestinian Catastrophe 1948

AL NAKBA: The Palestinian Catastrophe 1948 from Benny Brunner on Vimeo.

The film was made in 1997...

On Kosher Statistics

By Gilad Atzmon

The Jewish ADL (Anti Defamation League) revealed this week that more than ‘one in four adults are ‘anti-Semitic.’

Of Some 53,100 adults in 102 countries and territories around the world surveyed for the ADL Global 100: An Index of Anti-Semitism, 26% were found to be ‘deeply infected’ with ‘anti-Semitic attitudes.’

Personally, I find both the ADL and its polls quite amusing.  Can you think of another people on this planet who so spend so much time and energy measuring how much they are loved or hated? Do the Brits measure how despised they are in Moldovia? Do the Palestinians question people all over the world to see how much they love those indigenous people of Palestine? Well, the Jews do and it’s for a reason. Abe Foxman, ADL’s National Director, must by now have grasped the immense destructive global power of Jewish politics, so naturally he wants to measure the reaction. But rather than reflecting on the results and then turning to his own people in the hope of re-educating them, Foxman always blames the rest of humanity. And why? Because in the Judeo-centric cosmos, the Jew is always innocent and the Goy is always to blame.

ADL discovered that the least anti-Semitic country at 0.2% of the adult population ‘hating Jews.’ is ........Laos! But what does that mean? Should the ADL start to shlep Jews to Laos? Maybe, rather than Palestine, it is Laos that is the promised land. Trouble is, once the Jews start to immigrate to Laos, anti Semitic attitudes will sharply rise. ADL is yet to resolve this Jewish dilemma yet.

Click to read more ...

Former PM Ehud Olmert jailed for six years for corruption

http://www.ynetnews.com

For first time in Israel's history, former PM jailed: Judge sentences former prime minister Ehud Olmert to 6 years in jail for his role in real-estate development corruption affair.

Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was sentenced to six years in prison and fined NIS 1 million in court in Tel Aviv on Tuesday morning for his role in the 'Holyland Affair', the real estate corruption case considered the largest of its kind in Israeli history.

The case marks the first time a prime minister was convicted of a felony and now, with his sentencing, the first time a former prime minister has ever been sentenced to jail time.

Must watch - What Does it Mean to be a Friend of Israel?

By Anthony Lawson

Imperial Decay (must watch)

Call it colonialism, call it occupation - just don't call it 'apartheid'

An introduction by Gilad Atzmon: It is pretty amusing to witness Jewish shallow minds performing terminological zigzagging. For many years I have been insisting that Israel is not apartheid and has never been one. While apartheid is a system of exploitation, the Jewish State is a racially driven ethnic cleanser, it wants the Palestinians gone. Tagging Israel as a ‘colonial state’ and an ‘apartheid’ apparatus was introduced by the Jewish Left - for the obvious reason that they wanted to disguise the extent of the crime committed by Jewish nationalism. They want to convey the image that Israeli aggression isn’t really different from British, French and Dutch colonialism nor that it is different from South Africa or Southern USA Apartheid. But the truth of the matter is embarrassing. Zionism and Israeli aggression are unique phenomena.

But “if apartheid is not the right term, what is a better term?” The Jewish Left attempts to introduce a new spin, they call it now “settler colonialism” and a “pro-settler military occupation” but the truth is very simple to grasp. Being an expansionist, racist and ethnic cleanser, the Jewish State is a Nazi like operation. This is the truth the Jewish Left attempts to disguise.       

Call it colonialism, call it occupation - just don't call it 'apartheid'

http://972mag.com/call-it-colonialism-call-it-occupation-just-dont-call-it-apartheid/90537/

‘Apartheid’ is rapidly becoming the new political term of condemnation and delegitimization in international politics. But is it truly the best description of Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians? 

By Thomas Mitchell

Is apartheid an appropriate term to describe Israel’s occupation of the West Bank? In an article published on +972 late last year, Ran Greenstein argued that it is, relying on international law rather than historical grounds admitting that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank is different—but not better—than South Africa between 1948 and 1994. “Apartheid” is rapidly becoming the new political term of condemnation and delegitimization in international politics. It is rapidly replacing fascism as that term. India used to refer to the nuclear non-proliferation regime as “nuclear apartheid.” But the process is instructive.

Click to read more ...

Top 10 Holocaust Films

Jewish suffering loves the big screen and vice versa...

I Love Dieudonné!

Born Smart, Born Equal, Born Different – On The Road To Meritocracy

By Gilad Atzmon

After decades of the tyranny of political correctness driven by ID politics and Jewish sensitivities, it takes the BBC three 30 minute episodes to reveal to the Brits that genes make a difference. Some people are just born smarter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fax09ksviY8

For some time Brits haven’t been allowed to admit to themselves that people are different, mostly because they are actually born different - a few are really smart, many are average and some are falling behind. The dominance of ‘progressive’ outlets such as The Guardian within middle class political discourse has led toward an unfortunate dismissal of an obvious scientific fact – genes and biology cause differences among people.

Despite the apologetic tone of the program and the usual cliché complaints about the Holocaust being a ‘eugenic project’, the BBC is brave to take on the topic.  To start with, the program clears the smoke around the work of Sir Francis Galton, the father of Eugenic Science. The program elaborates on the historical context in which Galton’s research took place. But the program also touches the contemporary fear of British degeneration. Britain is clearly falling behind its economic competitors in its intellectual skills. British kids are not as good in science and math as they used to be. 

Britain is changing direction. It is rapidly drifting away from the welfare state and an egalitarian philosophy. The BBC program reflects this change. Britain is becoming a meritocracy. British policy makers apparently believe that funds and facilities should be invested in individuals according to merit. The rapid rise of university tuition fees coupled with a withdrawal of funds from state education suggests that British leadership no longer believes in supporting the weak and the under-privileged. Instead it is supporting the development of the cognitive elite. And,  it seems, membership in the cognitive elite has a lot to do with heredity. People are not becoming more clever through school or university, they are actually born smart.

In the last decade British policy makers have learned to accept that thousands of unemployed ‘gender studies’ or ‘music technology’ graduates are not going to march British society forward. Instead of thousand of universities that produce graduation certificates of questionable value, the modern state needs top scientists, genius engineers, superb economists, programmers, a few poets, less than a few philosophers, two painters and probably one who can play the fiddle exceptionally well. British policy makers have grasped that the cultivation of such a skilled elite must take biology into account.

Such a policy, once implemented, will radically change the role of education and culture.  It will revise our ideas of equality, morality and the role of the State. In the new meritocratic order, people are what they are because they are born that way - social mobility becomes subject to intellectual merit. The gifted prevail and the slow fall behind, reduced into an underclass and eventually irrelevant to society. 

In the new order, liability and accountability evaporate. As much as the member of the elite was born smarter, the criminal may owe his ethical failure to biology. Such a view will transform our vision of the role of education, personal history and civic duty. It is certainly going to radically revise our notions of success and failure.   

Responding to Paul Larudee; Is BDS “Soft Zionist?”

By Charles E. Carlson

http://whtt.org/open-letter-to-boycott-divestiture-sanction-are-you-soft-zionist/

April 7, 2014

Mr. Omar Barghouti, Co -Founder, BDS Movement.

Dear Mr. Barghouti

I am adding my voice to Paul Larudee’s March 23,  open letter to you.  We have not met, I hope we do.   I am informed that you were a co-founder of an organization, BDS Movement in Palestine which has morphed  into a world wide network of individuals and organizations now referred to as the “BDS movement,” and that you do not  run the day to day project of that network.

To review what Mr. Laradee has already said, someone in BDS, The Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions movement has materially diluted the founding purposes agreed upon by yourself and 172 organizations in 2005.   The BDS Movement original “Call” urges various forms of boycott against Israel until it meets its obligations under international law by: “(1) ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the barrier Wall,” but this language has now been changed, apparently without notifying those of us who participate in the present, BDS movement.

The new  language is very different, as Mr Larudee pointed out: the  Call urges various forms of boycott against Israel until it meets its obligations under international law by: “Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands occupied in June 1967 and dismantling the Wall.”  Mr. Larudee  calls these words, now found on the BDS website, “Soft Zionism:”  I agree.

Click to read more ...